An individual assessment of student professionalism throughout the quarter. Students are expected to maintain a professional approach to work and approach all classes as professional engagements. Part of this grade is determined via deliverables relating to pollEverywhere engagement, written responses and other deliverables to cases and verbal communication in class.
Deliverable | Due Date | Canvas Submission Portal |
---|---|---|
Professionalism Assessment | Classes 1 - 18 | No Canvas Submission Required |
Further details are provided below for each required deliverable.
Required deliverable: As part of professionalism is determined via deliverables relating to software deliverables, pollEverywhere engagement, written responses to cases, and verbal communication in class, this section provides details on what is collected and how to be successful in this component of the course.
This policy outlines expectations for the responsible and ethical use of generative AI technologies, including large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, in this course. These tools can significantly enhance learning, productivity, and creativity–but must be used transparently and professionally to support a respectful and effective learning environment.
Generative AI may be used to assist with idea generation, research, document drafting, programming, editing, and other academic work, provided the output is critically reviewed, refined, and understood by the student or team. Use of AI is encouraged when it enhances the learning process.
Students are responsible for the accuracy, relevance, and integrity of any work submitted, including content influenced or generated by AI tools. Errors introduced by generative AI–factual, analytical, or interpretive–will be treated as student errors and may result in reduced grades.
Students may be asked to disclose when and how they used generative AI tools in individual or team assignments. In cases where the use of AI significantly contributes to the submission (e.g., coding assistance, text drafting), students should include a brief statement describing the use.
Submitting AI–generated content without understanding it, using AI to bypass individual learning (e.g., for comprehension–based quizzes or in–class polls), or allowing AI to make up sources or misrepresent work is a violation of course expectations and academic integrity.
This policy may be updated as the role of AI in education continues to evolve.